<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Big to Succeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chismheritagefarm.com/2012/06/28/too-big-to-succeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chismheritagefarm.com/2012/06/28/too-big-to-succeed/</link>
	<description>A Stewardship Chronicle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:45:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailorssmallfarm</title>
		<link>http://chismheritagefarm.com/2012/06/28/too-big-to-succeed/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sailorssmallfarm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chismheritagefarm.wordpress.com/?p=1309#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are so many of us in this dilemma.  Working off farm, trying to get the farm to pay for itself, pay us, and still have some sanity and a marriage at the end of it all. Oh and do all this in a way that nurtures and heals the land.  In short,  you need an enterprise with low start up, low infrastructure, fast turnaround, minimum labour, quick returns, that is a sure sell.  You need the goose that lays the golden eggs!  Seriously, I had a quick look at &quot;You Can Farm&quot; again last night after I read this post.  Go flip through Chapter 10 and 11.  Your blueberry idea might be a good fit, except for the start up.  And remember Salatin&#039;s thoughts about &quot;bankruptcy tubes&quot; - I am currently stuck in the trap of my own infrastructure, and have just woken up to that...you might be too, at least in regard to expanding existing enterprises.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many of us in this dilemma.  Working off farm, trying to get the farm to pay for itself, pay us, and still have some sanity and a marriage at the end of it all. Oh and do all this in a way that nurtures and heals the land.  In short,  you need an enterprise with low start up, low infrastructure, fast turnaround, minimum labour, quick returns, that is a sure sell.  You need the goose that lays the golden eggs!  Seriously, I had a quick look at &#8220;You Can Farm&#8221; again last night after I read this post.  Go flip through Chapter 10 and 11.  Your blueberry idea might be a good fit, except for the start up.  And remember Salatin&#8217;s thoughts about &#8220;bankruptcy tubes&#8221; &#8211; I am currently stuck in the trap of my own infrastructure, and have just woken up to that&#8230;you might be too, at least in regard to expanding existing enterprises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
